AMD A8-6600K vs AMD FX-4170

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks

-VS-

CPU lineage

AMD A8-6600K or AMD A8-6600K – which processor offers superior performance? In this comparison, we examine disparities and assess which of these two CPUs outperforms the other. We delve into technical specifications and benchmark outcomes.
The AMD A8-6600K features 4 processor cores and has the capability to manage 4 threads concurrently.
It was released in Q2/2013 and belongs to the 3 generation of the AMD A series.
To use the AMD A8-6600K, you'll need a motherboard with a FM2 socket.
The AMD FX-4170 features 4 processor cores and has the capability to manage 4 threads concurrently.
It was released in Q1/2012 and belongs to the 1 generation of the AMD FX series.
To use the AMD FX-4170, you'll need a motherboard with a AM3+ socket.
AMD A8-6600K Name AMD FX-4170
3 Generation 1
Desktop / Server Segment Desktop / Server
AMD A Family AMD FX
AMD A8-6000 Group AMD FX-4100/4200
 
 

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The AMD A8-6600K has 4 CPU cores and can calculate 4 threads in parallel.
The clock frequency of the AMD A8-6600K is 3.9 GHz
and turbo frequency for one core is 4.2 GHz.
The AMD FX-4170 has 4 CPU cores and can calculate 4 threads in parallel.
The clock frequency of the AMD FX-4170 is 4.2 GHz
and turbo frequency for one core is 4.4 GHz.
4.2 GHz Turbo Frequency (1 core) 4.4 GHz
No Hyperthreading No
4.2 GHz Turbo Frequency (all cores) 4.4 GHz
4x Cores 4x
3.9 GHz Frequency 4.2 GHz
Yes Overclocking Yes
4 Threads 4
normal Core architecture normal
4 CPU Cores 4
 
 

Internal Graphics

The AMD A8-6600K has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short.
Specifically, the AMD A8-6600K uses the AMD Radeon HD 8570D, which has 256 texture shaders
and 4 execution units.
The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die.
The AMD FX-4170 does not have integrated graphics.
4 Execution units --
AMD Radeon HD 8570D GPU name
11.2 Direct X --
0.84 GHz GPU frequency --
2.0 GB Max. GPU Memory 0 bytes
-- GPU (Turbo) --
5 Generation --
Q2/2013 Release date --
-- Max. displays --
32 nm Technology --
256 Shaders --
 
 

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --
 
 

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.
Decode / Encode JPEG --
Decode AVC --
No h265 / HEVC (8 bit) --
No VP8 --
Decode VC-1 --
No AV1 --
No VP9 --
No h265 / HEVC (10 bit) --
Decode h264 --
 
 

Memory & PCIe

pci PCIe pci
2 Memory channels 2
DDR3-1866 Memory type DDR3-1866
0 bytes Max. Memory 0 bytes
No ECC Yes
-- Bandwidth --
Yes AES-NI Yes
 
 

Thermal Management

The processor has a thermal design power (TDP) of 100 W watts.
TDP indicates the cooling solution needed to effectively manage the processor's heat. It generally provides an approximate indication of the actual power consumption of the CPU itself.
The processor has a thermal design power (TDP) of 125 W watts.
100 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) 125 W
-- Tjunction max --
 
 

Technical details

The AMD A8-6600K is manufactured using a 32 nm process.
A smaller manufacturing process indicates a more contemporary and energy-efficient CPU.
In total, this processor boasts a generous 4.0 MB cache.
A substantial cache can significantly enhance the processor's performance, particularly in scenarios like gaming.
The AMD FX-4170 is manufactured using a 32 nm process.
In total, this processor boasts a generous 8.0 MB cache.
0 bytes L2-Cache 0 bytes
Windows 10, Linux Operating systems Windows 10, Linux
-- Part Number --
AMD-V Virtualization AMD-V
4.0 MB L3-Cache 8.0 MB
Richland (Piledriver) Architecture Zambezi (Bulldozer)
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit)
85 $ Release price 120 $
Technical data sheet Documents Technical data sheet
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4 ISA extensions SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX
-- Chip design --
Q2/2013 Release date Q1/2012
FM2 Socket AM3+
32 nm Technology 32 nm
 
 

Benchmarks