AMD E-450 vs AMD A8-3800

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks

-VS-

CPU lineage

AMD E-450 or AMD E-450 – which processor offers superior performance? In this comparison, we examine disparities and assess which of these two CPUs outperforms the other. We delve into technical specifications and benchmark outcomes.
The AMD E-450 features 2 processor cores and has the capability to manage 2 threads concurrently.
It was released in Q3/2011 and belongs to the 1 generation of the AMD E series.
To use the AMD E-450, you'll need a motherboard with a BGA 413 socket.
The AMD A8-3800 features 4 processor cores and has the capability to manage 4 threads concurrently.
It was released in Q3/2011 and belongs to the 1 generation of the AMD A series.
To use the AMD A8-3800, you'll need a motherboard with a FM1 socket.
1 Generation 1
AMD E Family AMD A
AMD E/E1/E2-1000 Group AMD A8-3000
AMD E-450 Name AMD A8-3800
Mobile Segment Desktop / Server
 
 

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The AMD E-450 has 2 CPU cores and can calculate 2 threads in parallel.
The clock frequency of the AMD E-450 is 1.65 GHz
The AMD A8-3800 has 4 CPU cores and can calculate 4 threads in parallel.
The clock frequency of the AMD A8-3800 is 2.4 GHz
and turbo frequency for one core is 2.7 GHz.
None None 2.7 GHz
2 Threads 4
1.65 GHz Frequency 2.4 GHz
2x Cores 4x
No Hyperthreading No
None None 2.7 GHz
2 CPU Cores 4
normal Core architecture normal
No Overclocking Yes
 
 

Internal Graphics

The AMD E-450 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short.
Specifically, the AMD E-450 uses the AMD Radeon HD 6320, which has 80 texture shaders
and 1 execution units.
The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die.
The AMD A8-3800 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short.
Specifically, the AMD A8-3800 uses the AMD Radeon HD 6550D, which has 400 texture shaders
and 5 execution units.
3 Generation 3
Q4/2010 Release date Q2/2011
-- Max. displays --
1 Execution units 5
80 Shaders 400
-- GPU (Turbo) --
0.51 GHz GPU frequency 0.6 GHz
40 nm Technology 32 nm
AMD Radeon HD 6320 GPU name AMD Radeon HD 6550D
1.0 GB Max. GPU Memory 1.0 GB
11 Direct X 11
 
 

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

-- AI specifications --
-- AI hardware --
 
 

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.
Decode / Encode JPEG Decode / Encode
Decode h264 Decode
No AV1 No
No VP9 No
No h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
Decode AVC Decode
No h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
No VP8 No
Decode VC-1 Decode
 
 

Memory & PCIe

1 Memory channels 2
0 bytes Max. Memory 0 bytes
Memory type DDR3-1600
Yes AES-NI No
-- Bandwidth --
No ECC No
pci PCIe pci
 
 

Thermal Management

The processor has a thermal design power (TDP) of 18 W watts.
TDP indicates the cooling solution needed to effectively manage the processor's heat. It generally provides an approximate indication of the actual power consumption of the CPU itself.
The processor has a thermal design power (TDP) of 65 W watts.
18 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) 65 W
-- Tjunction max --
 
 

Technical details

The AMD E-450 is manufactured using a 32 nm process.
A smaller manufacturing process indicates a more contemporary and energy-efficient CPU.
In total, this processor boasts a generous 1.0 MB cache.
A substantial cache can significantly enhance the processor's performance, particularly in scenarios like gaming.
The AMD A8-3800 is manufactured using a 32 nm process.
In total, this processor boasts a generous 4.0 MB cache.
Q3/2011 Release date Q3/2011
Zacate (Bobcat) Architecture Llano (K10)
Technical data sheet Documents Technical data sheet
AMD-V Virtualization AMD-V
-- Chip design --
1.0 MB L3-Cache 4.0 MB
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX ISA extensions SSE3, SSE4a
32 nm Technology 32 nm
BGA 413 Socket FM1
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit)
-- Part Number --
-- Release price 130 $
Operating systems Windows 10, Linux
0 bytes L2-Cache 0 bytes
 
 

Benchmarks

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

AMD A8-3800
4C 4T @ 2.4 GHz
4738
4738
AMD E-450
2C 2T @ 1.65 GHz
1136
1136

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

AMD A8-3800
4C 4T @ 2.4 GHz
1994
1994
AMD E-450
2C 2T @ 1.65 GHz
431
431

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

AMD A8-3800
4C 4T @ 2.4 GHz
1355
1355
AMD E-450
2C 2T @ 1.65 GHz
622
622

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

AMD A8-3800
4C 4T @ 2.4 GHz
1354
1354
AMD E-450
2C 2T @ 1.65 GHz
220
220

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

AMD A8-3800
4C 4T @ 2.4 GHz
368
368
AMD E-450
2C 2T @ 1.65 GHz
122
122

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)

AMD A8-3800
4C 4T @ 2.4 GHz
24.6
24.6
AMD E-450
2C 2T @ 1.65 GHz
8.4
8.4

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

AMD A8-3800
4C 4T @ 2.4 GHz
2.9
2.9
AMD E-450
2C 2T @ 1.65 GHz
0.6
0.6