Intel Celeron E3200 vs AMD Athlon 5150

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks

-VS-

CPU lineage

Intel Celeron E3200 or Intel Celeron E3200 – which processor offers superior performance? In this comparison, we examine disparities and assess which of these two CPUs outperforms the other. We delve into technical specifications and benchmark outcomes.
The Intel Celeron E3200 features 2 processor cores and has the capability to manage 2 threads concurrently.
It was released in Q3/2009 and belongs to the 1 generation of the Intel Celeron series.
To use the Intel Celeron E3200, you'll need a motherboard with a LGA 775 socket.
The AMD Athlon 5150 features 4 processor cores and has the capability to manage 4 threads concurrently.
It was released in Q2/2014 and belongs to the 3 generation of the AMD Athlon series.
To use the AMD Athlon 5150, you'll need a motherboard with a AM1 socket.
1 Generation 3
Intel Celeron Family AMD Athlon
Intel Celeron E3000 Group AMD Athlon 5000
Intel Celeron E3200 Name AMD Athlon 5150
Desktop / Server Segment Desktop / Server
 
 

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The Intel Celeron E3200 has 2 CPU cores and can calculate 2 threads in parallel.
The clock frequency of the Intel Celeron E3200 is 2.4 GHz
The AMD Athlon 5150 has 4 CPU cores and can calculate 4 threads in parallel.
The clock frequency of the AMD Athlon 5150 is 1.6 GHz
2.4 GHz Frequency 1.6 GHz
2 CPU Cores 4
2x Core Cores 4x
normal Core architecture normal
Yes Overclocking Yes
No Hyperthreading No
2 Threads 4
 
 

Internal Graphics

The Intel Celeron E3200 does not have integrated graphics.
The AMD Athlon 5150 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short.
Specifically, the AMD Athlon 5150 uses the AMD Radeon HD 8400, which has 128 texture shaders
and 2 execution units.
The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die.
-- Generation 5
-- Release date Q2/2013
-- Max. displays --
-- Execution units 2
-- Shaders 128
-- GPU (Turbo) --
-- GPU frequency 0.6 GHz
-- Technology 28 nm
GPU name AMD Radeon HD 8400
0 bytes Max. GPU Memory 2.0 GB
-- Direct X 11.1
 
 

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

-- AI specifications --
-- AI hardware --
 
 

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.
-- JPEG Decode / Encode
-- h264 Decode
-- AV1 No
-- VP9 No
-- h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
-- AVC Decode
-- h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
-- VP8 No
-- VC-1 Decode
 
 

Memory & PCIe

2 Memory channels 1
16.0 GB Max. Memory 0 bytes
DDR3-1066, DDR2-800 Memory type DDR3L-1600
No AES-NI Yes
-- Bandwidth 12.8 GB/s
No ECC No
pci PCIe pci
 
 

Thermal Management

The processor has a thermal design power (TDP) of 65 W watts.
TDP indicates the cooling solution needed to effectively manage the processor's heat. It generally provides an approximate indication of the actual power consumption of the CPU itself.
The processor has a thermal design power (TDP) of 25 W watts.
65 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) 25 W
-- Tjunction max --
 
 

Technical details

The Intel Celeron E3200 is manufactured using a 45 nm process.
A smaller manufacturing process indicates a more contemporary and energy-efficient CPU.
A substantial cache can significantly enhance the processor's performance, particularly in scenarios like gaming.
The AMD Athlon 5150 is manufactured using a 28 nm process.
In total, this processor boasts a generous 2.0 MB cache.
Q3/2009 Release date Q2/2014
Wolfdale (Penryn) Architecture Kabini (Jaguar)
Technical data sheet Documents Technical data sheet
VT-x Virtualization AMD-V
Monolithic Chip design --
0 bytes L3-Cache 2.0 MB
SSE3, MMX, SSE, SSE2 ISA extensions SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX
45 nm Technology 28 nm
LGA 775 Socket AM1
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit)
-- Part Number --
47 $ Release price 47 $
Windows 10, Linux Operating systems Windows 10, Linux
1.0 MB L2-Cache 0 bytes