MediaTek MT6732M vs Intel Celeron 430
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks |
||
 |
-VS- |  |
CPU lineage |
||
|
MediaTek MT6732M or MediaTek MT6732M – which processor offers superior performance? In this comparison, we examine disparities and assess which of these two CPUs outperforms the other. We delve into technical specifications and benchmark outcomes.
The Intel Celeron 430 features 1 processor cores and has the capability to manage 1 threads concurrently. It was released in Q2/2007 and belongs to the 1 generation of the Intel Celeron series. To use the Intel Celeron 430, you'll need a motherboard with a LGA 775 socket. |
||
| Family | Intel Celeron | |
| -- | Generation | 1 |
| MediaTek MT6732M | Name | Intel Celeron 430 |
| Group | Intel Celeron 400 | |
| -- | Segment | Desktop / Server |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency |
||
|
The Intel Celeron 430 has 1 CPU cores and can calculate 1 threads in parallel.
The clock frequency of the Intel Celeron 430 is 1.8 GHz The processor has one core only. |
||
| -- | CPU Cores | 1 |
| -- | Threads | 1 |
| -- | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| None | None | 1.8 GHz |
| None | None | 1x Core |
| No | Overclocking | No |
Internal Graphics |
||
|
The MediaTek MT6732M does not have integrated graphics.
The Intel Celeron 430 does not have integrated graphics. |
||
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| -- | Shaders | -- |
| -- | GPU frequency | -- |
| -- | Execution units | -- |
| -- | Generation | -- |
| -- | Max. displays | -- |
| -- | Technology | -- |
| -- | Release date | -- |
| -- | Direct X | -- |
| GPU name | ||
| 0 bytes | Max. GPU Memory | 0 bytes |
Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning |
||
| -- | AI hardware | -- |
| -- | AI specifications | -- |
Hardware codec support |
||
|
A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.
|
||
| -- | JPEG | -- |
| -- | h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | -- |
| -- | AVC | -- |
| -- | AV1 | -- |
| -- | VP9 | -- |
| -- | VP8 | -- |
| -- | h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | -- |
| -- | VC-1 | -- |
| -- | h264 | -- |
Memory & PCIe |
||
| -- | Memory channels | 2 |
| No | ECC | No |
| -- | Bandwidth | -- |
| Memory type | DDR3-1066, DDR2-800 | |
| 0 bytes | Max. Memory | 16.0 GB |
| No | AES-NI | No |
| pci | PCIe | pci |
Thermal Management |
||
|
TDP indicates the cooling solution needed to effectively manage the processor's heat. It generally provides an approximate indication of the actual power consumption of the CPU itself.
The processor has a thermal design power (TDP) of 35 W watts. |
||
| -- | Tjunction max | -- |
| None | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 35 W |
Technical details |
||
|
A smaller manufacturing process indicates a more contemporary and energy-efficient CPU.
A substantial cache can significantly enhance the processor's performance, particularly in scenarios like gaming. The Intel Celeron 430 is manufactured using a 65 nm process. |
||
| -- | Architecture | Conroe (Core) |
| Virtualization | None | |
| ISA extensions | SSE3, MMX, SSE, SSE2 | |
| 0 bytes | L3-Cache | 0 bytes |
| 0 bytes | L2-Cache | 512.0 KB |
| -- | Chip design | Monolithic |
| -- | Release price | -- |
| Technical data sheet | Documents | Technical data sheet |
| -- | Technology | 65 nm |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux | |
| -- | Release date | Q2/2007 |
| -- | Part Number | -- |
| Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) | |
| Socket | LGA 775 | |
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
