CPU comparison with benchmarks |
||
-VS- | ||
CPU lineage |
||
Intel Celeron E1400 or Intel Celeron E1400 – which processor offers superior performance? In this comparison, we examine disparities and assess which of these two CPUs outperforms the other. We delve into technical specifications and benchmark outcomes.
The Intel Celeron E1400 features 2 processor cores and has the capability to manage 2 threads concurrently. It was released in Q2/2008 and belongs to the 1 generation of the Intel Celeron series. To use the Intel Celeron E1400, you'll need a motherboard with a LGA 775 socket. The Intel Core2 Duo T5850 features 2 processor cores and has the capability to manage 2 threads concurrently. It belongs to the 1 generation of the Intel Celeron series. |
||
Intel Celeron | Family | Intel Celeron |
Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
Intel Celeron E1400 | Name | Intel Core2 Duo T5850 |
Intel Celeron E1000 | Group | Intel Core 2 Duo T5000 |
1 | Generation | 1 |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency |
||
The Intel Celeron E1400 has 2 CPU cores and can calculate 2 threads in parallel.
The clock frequency of the Intel Celeron E1400 is 2.0 GHz The Intel Core2 Duo T5850 has 2 CPU cores and can calculate 2 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the Intel Core2 Duo T5850 is 2.17 GHz |
||
normal | Core architecture | normal |
2x Core | Cores | 2x |
No | Hyperthreading | No |
2.0 GHz | Frequency | 2.17 GHz |
No | Overclocking | No |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2 | CPU Cores | 2 |
Internal Graphics |
||
The Intel Celeron E1400 does not have integrated graphics.
The Intel Core2 Duo T5850 does not have integrated graphics. |
||
-- | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
-- | Release date | -- |
-- | Execution units | -- |
-- | Direct X | -- |
-- | Max. displays | -- |
-- | Shaders | -- |
GPU name | ||
-- | GPU frequency | -- |
0 bytes | Max. GPU Memory | 0 bytes |
-- | Generation | -- |
-- | Technology | -- |
Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning |
||
-- | AI specifications | -- |
-- | AI hardware | -- |
Hardware codec support |
||
A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.
|
||
-- | VP8 | -- |
-- | VP9 | -- |
-- | AVC | -- |
-- | h264 | -- |
-- | JPEG | -- |
-- | VC-1 | -- |
-- | AV1 | -- |
-- | h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | -- |
-- | h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | -- |
Memory & PCIe |
||
No | AES-NI | No |
16.0 GB | Max. Memory | 0 bytes |
-- | Bandwidth | -- |
DDR3-1066, DDR2-800 | Memory type | |
pci | PCIe | pci |
2 | Memory channels | -- |
No | ECC | No |
Thermal Management |
||
The processor has a thermal design power (TDP) of 65 W watts.
TDP indicates the cooling solution needed to effectively manage the processor's heat. It generally provides an approximate indication of the actual power consumption of the CPU itself. The processor has a thermal design power (TDP) of 35 W watts. |
||
65 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 35 W |
-- | Tjunction max | 100 °C |
Technical details |
||
The Intel Celeron E1400 is manufactured using a 65 nm process.
A smaller manufacturing process indicates a more contemporary and energy-efficient CPU. A substantial cache can significantly enhance the processor's performance, particularly in scenarios like gaming. The Intel Core2 Duo T5850 is manufactured using a 65 nm process. |
||
Technical data sheet | Documents | Technical data sheet |
Q2/2008 | Release date | -- |
LGA 775 | Socket | |
512.0 KB | L2-Cache | 2.0 MB |
0 bytes | L3-Cache | 0 bytes |
Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | |
x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
-- | Part Number | -- |
Conroe (Core) | Architecture | Merom (Core) |
None | Virtualization | VT-x |
-- | Release price | -- |
SSE3, MMX, SSE, SSE2 | ISA extensions | SSE3, MMX, SSE, SSE2 |
Monolithic | Chip design | Monolithic |
65 nm | Technology | 65 nm |