Intel Celeron E1400 vs AMD FX-4150

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks

-VS-

CPU lineage

Intel Celeron E1400 or Intel Celeron E1400 – which processor offers superior performance? In this comparison, we examine disparities and assess which of these two CPUs outperforms the other. We delve into technical specifications and benchmark outcomes.
The Intel Celeron E1400 features 2 processor cores and has the capability to manage 2 threads concurrently.
It was released in Q2/2008 and belongs to the 1 generation of the Intel Celeron series.
To use the Intel Celeron E1400, you'll need a motherboard with a LGA 775 socket.
The AMD FX-4150 features 4 processor cores and has the capability to manage 4 threads concurrently.
It was released in Q2/2012 and belongs to the 1 generation of the AMD FX series.
To use the AMD FX-4150, you'll need a motherboard with a AM3+ socket.
Desktop / Server Segment Desktop / Server
1 Generation 1
Intel Celeron Family AMD FX
Intel Celeron E1400 Name AMD FX-4150
Intel Celeron E1000 Group AMD FX-4100/4200
 
 

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The Intel Celeron E1400 has 2 CPU cores and can calculate 2 threads in parallel.
The clock frequency of the Intel Celeron E1400 is 2.0 GHz
The AMD FX-4150 has 4 CPU cores and can calculate 4 threads in parallel.
The clock frequency of the AMD FX-4150 is 3.9 GHz
and turbo frequency for one core is 4.1 GHz.
2 Threads 4
2.0 GHz Frequency 3.9 GHz
2 CPU Cores 4
normal Core architecture normal
None None 4.1 GHz
2x Core Cores 4x
None None 4.1 GHz
No Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking Yes
 
 

Internal Graphics

The Intel Celeron E1400 does not have integrated graphics.
The AMD FX-4150 does not have integrated graphics.
-- Generation --
GPU name
-- Execution units --
0 bytes Max. GPU Memory 0 bytes
-- GPU (Turbo) --
-- Direct X --
-- Release date --
-- GPU frequency --
-- Shaders --
-- Technology --
-- Max. displays --
 
 

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

-- AI specifications --
-- AI hardware --
 
 

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.
-- h265 / HEVC (10 bit) --
-- VP9 --
-- JPEG --
-- VP8 --
-- h265 / HEVC (8 bit) --
-- VC-1 --
-- h264 --
-- AVC --
-- AV1 --
 
 

Memory & PCIe

No ECC Yes
16.0 GB Max. Memory 0 bytes
-- Bandwidth --
pci PCIe pci
No AES-NI Yes
2 Memory channels 2
DDR3-1066, DDR2-800 Memory type DDR3-1866
 
 

Thermal Management

The processor has a thermal design power (TDP) of 65 W watts.
TDP indicates the cooling solution needed to effectively manage the processor's heat. It generally provides an approximate indication of the actual power consumption of the CPU itself.
The processor has a thermal design power (TDP) of 95 W watts.
65 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) 95 W
-- Tjunction max --
 
 

Technical details

The Intel Celeron E1400 is manufactured using a 65 nm process.
A smaller manufacturing process indicates a more contemporary and energy-efficient CPU.
A substantial cache can significantly enhance the processor's performance, particularly in scenarios like gaming.
The AMD FX-4150 is manufactured using a 32 nm process.
In total, this processor boasts a generous 8.0 MB cache.
Windows 10, Linux Operating systems Windows 10, Linux
Conroe (Core) Architecture Zambezi (Bulldozer)
-- Release price --
Monolithic Chip design --
Q2/2008 Release date Q2/2012
None Virtualization AMD-V
LGA 775 Socket AM3+
SSE3, MMX, SSE, SSE2 ISA extensions SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit)
0 bytes L3-Cache 8.0 MB
-- Part Number --
512.0 KB L2-Cache 0 bytes
Technical data sheet Documents Technical data sheet
65 nm Technology 32 nm